This week, NOW talks with filmmaker Josh Fox about “Gasland”, his Sundance award-winning documentary on the surprising consequences of natural gas drilling. Fox’s film—inspired when the gas company came to his hometown—alleges chronic illness, animal-killing toxic waste, disastrous explosions, and regulatory missteps.

OBAMA: After they drove the car into the ditch, made it as difficult as possible for us to pull it back, now they want the keys back. No! You can’t drive! We don’t want to have to go back into the ditch. We just got the car out.

“You would have thought at a time of historic crisis that Republican leaders would have been more willing to help us find a way out of this mess,” Obama added. “Particularly since they created the mess.”

Now, you may take the train, but drive again? I don’t think so.

It was about a woman about to be made
Surgeon General of the United States and
the media uproar caused when it becomes known that she failed to report for jury duty because she misplaced
the summons the way some very busy mom’s do when life gets crazy at home

It really hit home for me showing how
our whole society has become infatuated with all the talking heads on TV and the internet. Most of these people really need to get their own life and actually worry about ONLY their own problems

by digby

Walter Shapiro at Politics Daily makes an interesting observation about Obama and Bush and it pertains to something that’s driving me nuts in the current health care debate: this sanctimonious lecturing by Republicans about how the Democrats are illegitimately “ramming health care reform down the people’s throats.” Like Shapiro, whenever I hear the Republicans lugubriously wax on about the president and the Democrats acting against the will of the people, I can’t help but think back to the early days of the Bush administration when the man who had been installed by a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court was rolling over the 50-50 Senate as if he’d won a landside.

Shapiro writes:
In short, Republicans like Graham are insisting that the majority-elected Obama must temper his ambitions because of fluctuating and ambiguous polls about health care. So what if Obama’s approval rating has never fallen below 47 percent in the daily Gallup tracking polls. Contrast this with Bush in 2001, who took office with only 51 percent of the American people in a CBS poll believing that he was elected legitimately. But because Bush was (wait for it) a “conviction politician,” he was entitled to pursue his expansive and expensive (in budget terms) agenda starting with massive tax cuts. As Rove writes with almost an audible sneer in his words that the Democrats “were surprised that he didn’t come to them on bended knee.”

He makes the case that if such a thing exists, Obama is a “conviction politician” as well for pursuing HCR, although I’m not sure that phrase accurately applies to either of these politicians. I don’t know exactly what makes either one tick, but convictions don’t jump to mind as the likeliest motivations.

But the contrast between how the Repubicans portrayed their right — no, duty — to enact Bush’s agenda regardless of a mandate or public opinion and their endless allusions to a weeping America forced to submit to a tyrannical Democratic majority (intent upon giving them access to health insurance) is stark. And it’s the kind of hypocrisy that’s making the country stupid.

…South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham begged the Democrats, “Please don’t do this…I’ll work with you to find a smaller bill that the American people feel more comfortable about. Let’s do a field goal on health care. Let’s [don't] score a touchdown by ramming it down somebody’s throat.”
Keep in mind that this is not only someone who fully supported President Bush after a dubious election result all the way to the point where he was 28% in the polls, but he was also one of the House managers who impeached a popular president in 1998 despite the fact that the country had just repudiated their jihad at the polls. What can you say to this level of intellectual dishonesty?